Chevy Forum   Chevy Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Chevrolet News   Search   Contact CF   Sponsors
  Member List   Forum FAQ   Chevy Timeslips   Chevy Recalls   TSBs   Calendars   Register   Login  

Who would win?

  Printable Version
Chevrolet >> Chevy Cars >> Camaro >> Who would win? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Who would win? - 11/12/2007 2:10:04 PM   
IamaMustangOwner

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 11/12/2007
Status: offline
New Mustang V8 or a 2002 Camaro SS?

Just curious
Post #: 1
RE: Who would win? - 11/16/2007 4:08:55 PM   
EuroGoldLS


Posts: 2105
Joined: 7/12/2007
From: Princeton, NC, USA
Status: online
EuroGoldLS's photo gallery
If both were stock,
The Mustang has a 4.8L 280hp engine, the Camaro has a 5.7L 310hp engine, you do the math.

_____________________________

PM me for a custom sig or avatar!

Please do not PM me about forum problems!

(in reply to IamaMustangOwner)
Post #: 2
RE: Who would win? - 11/17/2007 10:46:18 AM   
MalibuMaxxSS


Posts: 598
Joined: 11/18/2006
Status: offline
MalibuMaxxSS's photo gallery
the new mustangs are over 300 stock trim.....a cobra close 400....385 I think and the GT 500 is over 500......mustang is lighter then the old camaro SS as well......off the line the camaro just because of torgue, in hte QT dont know it would be close...

_____________________________

2006 Malibu Maxx SS, computer Flashed, undercar LED, Cold air intake, 18' Potenzas, Limo tint front to back

1990 YJ Lifted Locked and always muddy, posi loc, 33s TSLs, weber carb. drop tailgate...

(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 3
RE: Who would win? - 11/17/2007 11:58:00 PM   
engine2



Posts: 1707
Joined: 12/24/2006
Status: offline
Mustang GT 500 easily, but lets see what happens when the new camaro arrives.

(in reply to IamaMustangOwner)
Post #: 4
RE: Who would win? - 11/19/2007 10:31:38 AM   
MalibuMaxxSS


Posts: 598
Joined: 11/18/2006
Status: offline
MalibuMaxxSS's photo gallery
A GT500 yes would win, but a regular GT I dont know, no torque, HP is there but hte Camaro and the 5.7 pull V hard.....I tried in my 97 Cobra, SC, and a few other goodies, tried a formula firebird his was a 2001, 6 speed WS6 suspension, and 5.7 all the goodies, I was over 500hp, but the torque on the FB and the Camaros made it interesting till about 3rd gear, then I left him, but surprised me...

_____________________________

2006 Malibu Maxx SS, computer Flashed, undercar LED, Cold air intake, 18' Potenzas, Limo tint front to back

1990 YJ Lifted Locked and always muddy, posi loc, 33s TSLs, weber carb. drop tailgate...

(in reply to engine2)
Post #: 5
RE: Who would win? - 12/29/2007 4:55:04 PM   
BigBoom360ci


Posts: 58
Joined: 8/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EuroGoldLS

If both were stock,
The Mustang has a 4.8L 280hp engine, the Camaro has a 5.7L 310hp engine, you do the math.


If that camaro cant hook up goodbye camaro

_____________________________

Bulldogg Kustoms Est. 2006* Specialize in Mechanics, Autobody, Fabrication for American vehicles.

I bring the thunder like a bombshell in your headset!
1970 Nova SS 360ci
1992 Ford F150 300ci
1998 Ram 4x4 318ci
1976 Cadillac Coupe Deville 50

(in reply to EuroGoldLS)
Post #: 6
RE: Who would win? - 1/15/2008 8:44:06 AM   
GFunkk

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 1/10/2008
Status: offline
Both running stock 5.0. Got to say the Camaro. Mustangs have too much of a weight transfer from front to back, good for hooking up, not good for quick momentum. Camaro has a stiffer suspension travel in the rear, not bad for hooking up, but good for equal weight transfer. I try not to ride in Mustangs as often as I can.

(in reply to BigBoom360ci)
Post #: 7
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
Chevrolet Forum >> Chevy Cars >> Camaro
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
zx1100f12429
73shark2210
biglg2166
eurogoldls2105
engine21707
tahoe071139
shawnvw988
northey87866
golfer610
malibumaxxss598

New Vendors
K&N Engineering, Inc.

Chevrolet Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Chevrolet Motors Division or General Motors.